Sony Music just filed a new copyright lawsuit against AI music startup Udio, alleging the platform illegally scraped more than 30,000 recordings from YouTube to train its models. The label is seeking statutory damages of up to $150,000 per infringed work, arguing that machine-generated tracks threaten to cheapen and drown out original recordings. The move follows a judge's refusal to let Sony append the tracks to its 2024 case.
The American Federation of Musicians just filed a lawsuit against Universal Music Group and Warner Music, accusing the record giants of licensing members' recordings to AI music startups Suno and Udio without paying or crediting session players. The union argues these deals trigger a "new use" clause under collective bargaining agreements, demanding damages and full disclosure of the training data used.
Udio just rolled out Voices, a new tool giving creators tighter control over song vocals. You can now pick from a curated library of pre-loaded vocal styles or extract and save the voice from a generated track to reuse across future songs. It is free for everyone for two weeks before moving behind the paywall.
Radiohead frontman Thom Yorke didn't hold back in a new interview, calling generative AI a tech-bro nightmare that steals from artists to spit out pallid facsimiles. He questioned whether AI has any genuine creative originality at all, arguing that its underlying economic structure is morally wrong for failing to credit human creators.
Universal, Warner, and Sony are in talks to license their catalogs to AI music startups Suno and Udio. The labels are pushing for licensing fees and equity stakes to settle ongoing copyright lawsuits, potentially setting the precedent for how AI companies compensate recording artists.
Civitai just unveiled SPINE, a unified creative workflow integrating leading external generative tools like Kling AI, Udio, and ElevenLabs into a single workspace. Creators can now string together multi-model media pipelines without tab-juggling, paying via Civitai's Buzz credit system.
The RIAA just filed massive copyright lawsuits against AI music generators Suno and Udio, claiming they unlawfully scraped vast catalogs of copyrighted songs to train their models and demanding up to $150,000 per infringing work. While the labels argue AI songalikes threaten their core business, the startups lean on fair use. Why it matters: this battle could redefine how all generative AI models license training data.
Universal Music, Warner Music, and Sony Music just sued AI music startups Suno and Udio, alleging they illegally trained their models on copyrighted recordings without permission or payment. Led by the RIAA, the labels seek up to $150,000 per infringed work, totaling billions in potential damages. The copyright battles seen in text and images have officially hit AI music, likely forcing eventual licensing deals.
AI music generator Udio just dropped udio-130, a new model capable of generating up to two minutes of continuous music from a single prompt. The update significantly improves long-term coherence and song structure without needing manual clip extensions. For now, it's an experimental perk at discounted credit rates for Pro subscribers, with broader rollout coming soon.
Udio just bumped its track limit to 15 minutes and stretched extension context from 30 seconds to 2 minutes. That extra memory means the model can remember parts from earlier in your song, finally making consistent choruses possible in long mixes.
Udio just opened its AI music creation app to the public, letting anyone generate fully mastered tracks with vocals in under 40 seconds from text prompts. Backed by a16z alongside music icons like will.i.am, the platform also features text-based remixing and song extension. Why it matters: Udio brings high-fidelity music production to anyone with an idea, intensifying competition in generative audio.
