Skip to content
IFAI

Generative media

Disney's Loki poster sparks AI backlash

Published Reach 37

Disney just found itself under fire from the creative community over a Loki Season 2 poster suspected of using generative AI in its background. While artists flagged artifacts in the Shutterstock stock image, Shutterstock later investigated and insisted the piece was crafted with traditional software rather than AI tools.

Disney's Loki poster sparks AI backlash
Image: theverge.com

Marvel fans were hyped for the second season of Loki on Disney Plus, but professional illustrators were busy pulling out the magnifying glass.

Artist Katria Raden called out the official promo poster on X, pointing out that the spiraling clock in the background showed classic generative AI artifacts, like lines randomly melting into meaningless squiggles. Online sleuths quickly traced the background to a Shutterstock stock image titled “Surreal Infinity Time Spiral Space Antique.”

One user who bought the asset found that it was uploaded this year, contained zero metadata about how it was made, and lit up multiple AI image detectors as machine-generated. That raised eyebrows because Shutterstock’s own terms forbid AI-generated uploads unless they are created using the platform's proprietary in-house tool.

The Droste effect defense

Disney already took serious heat earlier this year for using generative AI in the intro of Secret Invasion, so the creative community was primed to jump on this. Disney completely ignored requests for comment about whether it licensed the stock image or used AI to assemble the tiny figures around Tom Hiddleston.

Then came an unexpected twist from Shutterstock.

Danielle De Voe, Shutterstock’s VP of marketplace strategy, stated that a thorough investigation confirmed the image was not created by AI. According to the company, the artist used a software tool to produce the Droste Effect—a recursive visual loop—and the technical quirks of that process mimicked the artifacts usually left by AI generators. Shutterstock, however, declined to name the actual software tool used.

Why it matters

This controversy exposes the massive paranoia and total lack of trust currently plaguing the commercial art industry.

We think the scariest takeaway here is how easily digital art can trigger an AI witch hunt. Automated AI detectors are notoriously unreliable, yet people treat their readouts as hard proof. When genuine algorithmic filters or complex software distortions start looking identical to Midjourney flaws, innocent human illustrators get caught in the crossfire.

For major studios like Disney and platforms like Shutterstock or Adobe, it highlights an uncomfortable reality: transparency is no longer optional. Disney's silence didn't help, especially after Secret Invasion burned bridges with human designers.

As stock libraries get flooded with cheap machine-made assets and cost-cutting teams look for quick shortcuts, human artists who rely on licensing are right to feel anxious. Even when an image turns out to be human-made, the fact that an audience immediately suspects automated cost-cutting shows just how strained the relationship between Hollywood and the creative community has become.

Sources (1)

  1. [1]
    theverge.com(opens in a new tab)Originaltheverge.com

Best of AI, daily